<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defensive Domain Registration Advice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliotsblog.com/defensive-domain-registration-advice-3432/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/defensive-domain-registration-advice-3432</link>
	<description>Domain blog featuring domain investing strategy, domain valuation, and domain development commentary from Elliot Silver, founder of Top Notch Domains, LLC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wondering</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/defensive-domain-registration-advice-3432#comment-13453</link>
		<dc:creator>wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=2978#comment-13453</guid>
		<description>Moreover, they are potentially losing traffic (and hence revenue) to ISP&#039;s or other DNS providers, or whomever, who may capitalise on typo traffic.

At $10/yr per domain, I just don&#039;t get it.

What am I missing here???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moreover, they are potentially losing traffic (and hence revenue) to ISP&#8217;s or other DNS providers, or whomever, who may capitalise on typo traffic.</p>
<p>At $10/yr per domain, I just don&#8217;t get it.</p>
<p>What am I missing here???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wondering</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/defensive-domain-registration-advice-3432#comment-13452</link>
		<dc:creator>wondering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=2978#comment-13452</guid>
		<description>Hi Elliot

I am still getting up to speed with all things domains, having stepped away from it in the 90&#039;s.

I am perplexed why some companies that (would appear) to clearly know the esoterics of typo traffic DO NOT register very well known typo patterns.
There is an example site I came across that gets 8,000+ visits per day, and is specifically in the internet ad business and they have not registered any typo variations on their domain name.
They have a US-regsitered TM.  I did not bother to check for other countries.
Even if they would easily win a UDRP claim or if their legal counsel could intimidate a &#039;typo squatter&#039; to give up a typo domain, both of these options cost money- more money than annual registration fees for the typos that get significant traffic.

Is this yet another example of lack of common sense toward computing, or am I missing something obvious?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Elliot</p>
<p>I am still getting up to speed with all things domains, having stepped away from it in the 90&#8242;s.</p>
<p>I am perplexed why some companies that (would appear) to clearly know the esoterics of typo traffic DO NOT register very well known typo patterns.<br />
There is an example site I came across that gets 8,000+ visits per day, and is specifically in the internet ad business and they have not registered any typo variations on their domain name.<br />
They have a US-regsitered TM.  I did not bother to check for other countries.<br />
Even if they would easily win a UDRP claim or if their legal counsel could intimidate a &#8216;typo squatter&#8217; to give up a typo domain, both of these options cost money- more money than annual registration fees for the typos that get significant traffic.</p>
<p>Is this yet another example of lack of common sense toward computing, or am I missing something obvious?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hkitos</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/defensive-domain-registration-advice-3432#comment-13100</link>
		<dc:creator>hkitos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 08:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=2978#comment-13100</guid>
		<description>I have registered many domains to prevent cybersquatting. it&#039;s worth of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have registered many domains to prevent cybersquatting. it&#8217;s worth of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ron</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/defensive-domain-registration-advice-3432#comment-13092</link>
		<dc:creator>ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=2978#comment-13092</guid>
		<description>elliot,

I have a dozen or so sites that include the word &quot;teachers&quot; and I registered all the same names using &quot;instructors&quot; just to cover all the bases......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>elliot,</p>
<p>I have a dozen or so sites that include the word &#8220;teachers&#8221; and I registered all the same names using &#8220;instructors&#8221; just to cover all the bases&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.elliotsblog.com @ 2012-02-09 20:35:42 -->
