Comments on: Garry Chernoff Launches eCommerce Sites http://www.elliotsblog.com/garry-chernoff-launches-ecommerce-sites-1039 Domain blog featuring domain investing strategy, domain valuation, and domain development commentary from Elliot Silver, founder of Top Notch Domains, LLC. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:30:34 +0000 hourly 1 By: Peter http://www.elliotsblog.com/garry-chernoff-launches-ecommerce-sites-1039#comment-19096 Peter Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:35:47 +0000 http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=4035#comment-19096 harris, most likely garry handregged those names harris,
most likely garry handregged those names

]]> By: event hire http://www.elliotsblog.com/garry-chernoff-launches-ecommerce-sites-1039#comment-18528 event hire Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:34:59 +0000 http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=4035#comment-18528 rofl those sites are hideous what a waste of time rofl
those sites are hideous
what a waste of time

]]> By: Phil http://www.elliotsblog.com/garry-chernoff-launches-ecommerce-sites-1039#comment-16111 Phil Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:35:02 +0000 http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=4035#comment-16111 agreed, yeah these sites are just thin affiliate sites that won't rank in the search engines that well and won't monetize either...been down this path myself, surprised Gary didn't just sell these to the big companies that would want them. agreed, yeah these sites are just thin affiliate sites that won’t rank in the search engines that well and won’t monetize either…been down this path myself, surprised Gary didn’t just sell these to the big companies that would want them.

]]> By: whoknows http://www.elliotsblog.com/garry-chernoff-launches-ecommerce-sites-1039#comment-16017 whoknows Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:32:56 +0000 http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=4035#comment-16017 Those websites are underdeveloped. I agree with the poster above that said these websites would be much better if they were done correctly, and partnered with a real business. The right idea is there, but the operation of the idea is lacking. Having a good idea doesn't mean a person (or group) know how to make it work to the fullest posibility. Just based on apperance I would give the websites a D. Those websites are underdeveloped. I agree with the poster above that said these websites would be much better if they were done correctly, and partnered with a real business. The right idea is there, but the operation of the idea is lacking. Having a good idea doesn’t mean a person (or group) know how to make it work to the fullest posibility.

Just based on apperance I would give the websites a D.

]]> By: Harris Reinhardt http://www.elliotsblog.com/garry-chernoff-launches-ecommerce-sites-1039#comment-16003 Harris Reinhardt Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:12:00 +0000 http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=4035#comment-16003 Hi Elliot....My post was really a comment on his press release in which he stated that he was "launching" new businesses. I only wanted to make the point that these sites are NOT businesses. I also understand your response to my post.....I am also a huge fan of creating sites with limited involvement/costs for passive income (your dogwalker site is a good example).....but not for domain names that may have cost tens of thousands of dollars to acquire. I am going to make the assumption that he did not hand reg. most of these names. To me, its sort of like investing in prime retail space on Madison Ave (only paying $7 a year in taxes) and holding an empty storefront until you are able to flip it for a profit. The only differences is, it would cost several hundred thousand dollars to convert your Madison Ave storefront into a fuctional retail space even if you found an experienced retailer to partner with. However, development costs on really good ecommerce sites has never been cheaper....for next to nothing he could develop these names into real businesses (and with the right partner, ALSO WITH LIMITED INVOLVEMENT). Hi Elliot….My post was really a comment on his press release in which he stated that he was “launching” new businesses. I only wanted to make the point that these sites are NOT businesses. I also understand your response to my post…..I am also a huge fan of creating sites with limited involvement/costs for passive income (your dogwalker site is a good example)…..but not for domain names that may have cost tens of thousands of dollars to acquire. I am going to make the assumption that he did not hand reg. most of these names. To me, its sort of like investing in prime retail space on Madison Ave (only paying $7 a year in taxes) and holding an empty storefront until you are able to flip it for a profit. The only differences is, it would cost several hundred thousand dollars to convert your Madison Ave storefront into a fuctional retail space even if you found an experienced retailer to partner with. However, development costs on really good ecommerce sites has never been cheaper….for next to nothing he could develop these names into real businesses (and with the right partner, ALSO WITH LIMITED INVOLVEMENT).

]]>