<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UDRP: &#8220;Geographic Names Are Not Subject to Trademark Protection&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliotsblog.com/geographic-names-are-not-subject-to-trademark-protection-09122/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/geographic-names-are-not-subject-to-trademark-protection-09122</link>
	<description>Domain blog featuring domain investing strategy, domain valuation, and domain development commentary from Elliot Silver, founder of Top Notch Domains, LLC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ciudad pierde dominio &#124; Dnzapping</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/geographic-names-are-not-subject-to-trademark-protection-09122#comment-17854</link>
		<dc:creator>Ciudad pierde dominio &#124; Dnzapping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 23:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=4618#comment-17854</guid>
		<description>[...] una actividad l&#237;cita, especialmente cuando son geodominios o dominios gen&#233;ricos. Como dijo el panelista Richard Page recientemente &quot;la norma general es que los nombres [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] una actividad l&iacute;cita, especialmente cuando son geodominios o dominios gen&eacute;ricos. Como dijo el panelista Richard Page recientemente &quot;la norma general es que los nombres [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Rask on the UDRP Process &#124; Elliot&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/geographic-names-are-not-subject-to-trademark-protection-09122#comment-17772</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Rask on the UDRP Process &#124; Elliot&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 18:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=4618#comment-17772</guid>
		<description>[...] you cannot agree, you can do what Nat did (in the LomaLinda.com UDRP): a 3-member Panel. But this is risky. You can still lose 2-1 by getting two people like Richard [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you cannot agree, you can do what Nat did (in the LomaLinda.com UDRP): a 3-member Panel. But this is risky. You can still lose 2-1 by getting two people like Richard [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Expires; City Believes Cyber Squatter Stole It &#124; Elliot&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/geographic-names-are-not-subject-to-trademark-protection-09122#comment-17674</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Expires; City Believes Cyber Squatter Stole It &#124; Elliot&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 04:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=4618#comment-17674</guid>
		<description>[...] geographic and non-trademarked domain names &#8211; after they expire. Just check out what a UDRP panelist said about geodomain names recently when he referenced, &#8220;“the general rule that geographic names are not subject to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] geographic and non-trademarked domain names &#8211; after they expire. Just check out what a UDRP panelist said about geodomain names recently when he referenced, &#8220;“the general rule that geographic names are not subject to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/geographic-names-are-not-subject-to-trademark-protection-09122#comment-17407</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:57:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=4618#comment-17407</guid>
		<description>PS:
After reading about the LomaLinda.net and LomaLinda.org decisions, I felt a closer review of Mr Richard W Page was warranted.  I did a quick search and was immediately met with domainers on forums calling this guy every name in the book.  

From DNForum in 2007: &quot;For some valuable domains ALWAYS go for 3-member panel. The biggest SOB panelist is Richard W. Page.  He is an example of why one should go for 3-member panel. Because to get this panelist = you lost the domain. Wouldn&#039;t surprise me one day some &quot;accident&quot; happens to this SOB when he strips of valuable generic domain someone who does not like to get f**ked...&quot; 

After digging a little deeper I believe this guy represents a genuine problem for domainers.  He was the sole dissenting panelist on the SuperSupplements.com decision (Respondent won), he handed BudgetSaver.com to Budget$aver, Crew.com to J Crew International, IHateGunBroker.com to Gun Broker...and those are just the first few I checked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS:<br />
After reading about the LomaLinda.net and LomaLinda.org decisions, I felt a closer review of Mr Richard W Page was warranted.  I did a quick search and was immediately met with domainers on forums calling this guy every name in the book.  </p>
<p>From DNForum in 2007: &#8220;For some valuable domains ALWAYS go for 3-member panel. The biggest SOB panelist is Richard W. Page.  He is an example of why one should go for 3-member panel. Because to get this panelist = you lost the domain. Wouldn&#8217;t surprise me one day some &#8220;accident&#8221; happens to this SOB when he strips of valuable generic domain someone who does not like to get f**ked&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>After digging a little deeper I believe this guy represents a genuine problem for domainers.  He was the sole dissenting panelist on the SuperSupplements.com decision (Respondent won), he handed BudgetSaver.com to Budget$aver, Crew.com to J Crew International, IHateGunBroker.com to Gun Broker&#8230;and those are just the first few I checked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/geographic-names-are-not-subject-to-trademark-protection-09122#comment-17406</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=4618#comment-17406</guid>
		<description>Whoa - was not aware of this:
&quot;But then recently the University filed a UDRP against the owner of lomalinda.net and lomalinda.org and they won. The sole panelist for that decision was Richard Page.&quot;

I also did not know that you could request a specific panelist???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa &#8211; was not aware of this:<br />
&#8220;But then recently the University filed a UDRP against the owner of lomalinda.net and lomalinda.org and they won. The sole panelist for that decision was Richard Page.&#8221;</p>
<p>I also did not know that you could request a specific panelist???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/10 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.elliotsblog.com @ 2012-02-09 22:17:17 -->
