<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Web Development, There is One Certainty&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliotsblog.com/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty</link>
	<description>Domain blog featuring domain investing strategy, domain valuation, and domain development commentary from Elliot Silver, founder of Top Notch Domains, LLC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty#comment-9325</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/index.php/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty/#comment-9325</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is a threat for good quality generic and brandable domains which have been well developed.  In fact it&#039;s probably a huge boost for decent quality generic domains where the brand is developed around the domain name. The domain will reinforce the brand and vice-versa.

However, I think Rob is right insofar that for ugly keyword-packed generic domains this might be bad news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is a threat for good quality generic and brandable domains which have been well developed.  In fact it&#8217;s probably a huge boost for decent quality generic domains where the brand is developed around the domain name. The domain will reinforce the brand and vice-versa.</p>
<p>However, I think Rob is right insofar that for ugly keyword-packed generic domains this might be bad news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wannadevelop.com</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty#comment-9323</link>
		<dc:creator>wannadevelop.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/index.php/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty/#comment-9323</guid>
		<description>Google rolled out a few big updates in January and February to their ranking algos.

They will change once again shortly.

And no those brands shouldn&#039;t rank #1.

Google wants to push those sites down because if they are at the top 5 or 10 they won&#039;t spend as much on PPC.

The big companies will be like &quot;oh hey, we are getting all this free traffic... no need to advertise&quot;

Quality sites with more content should rank ahead of all the big brand BS.

Google makes a lot of mistakes, this is just one of them... They get it a lot of times but they sure do screw up as well.

Look for changes... It&#039;s coming ;)

Best,

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google rolled out a few big updates in January and February to their ranking algos.</p>
<p>They will change once again shortly.</p>
<p>And no those brands shouldn&#8217;t rank #1.</p>
<p>Google wants to push those sites down because if they are at the top 5 or 10 they won&#8217;t spend as much on PPC.</p>
<p>The big companies will be like &#8220;oh hey, we are getting all this free traffic&#8230; no need to advertise&#8221;</p>
<p>Quality sites with more content should rank ahead of all the big brand BS.</p>
<p>Google makes a lot of mistakes, this is just one of them&#8230; They get it a lot of times but they sure do screw up as well.</p>
<p>Look for changes&#8230; It&#8217;s coming <img src='http://www.elliotsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty#comment-9298</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 20:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/index.php/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty/#comment-9298</guid>
		<description>It is a great post by aaron, and honestly makes a lot of sense. Personally i think that the auto insurance companies probably should rank ahead of some of the others - even though their site may not be SEO&#039;d as perfectly as the others. 

At the end of the day, you need to build up defensible traffic to your site, and the longer your site is around and the better the content is -(as Elliot says)  the more likely it is that you will become the brand that google favors

http://www.scoreboard-media.com/defensible-traffic/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a great post by aaron, and honestly makes a lot of sense. Personally i think that the auto insurance companies probably should rank ahead of some of the others &#8211; even though their site may not be SEO&#8217;d as perfectly as the others. </p>
<p>At the end of the day, you need to build up defensible traffic to your site, and the longer your site is around and the better the content is -(as Elliot says)  the more likely it is that you will become the brand that google favors</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scoreboard-media.com/defensible-traffic/" rel="nofollow">http://www.scoreboard-media.com/defensible-traffic/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Sequin</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty#comment-9296</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Sequin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/index.php/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty/#comment-9296</guid>
		<description>If that SEObook is right about Google&#039;s new preference for brand names in search engine rankings and if Google keeps it that way, that is very bad news for generic domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If that SEObook is right about Google&#8217;s new preference for brand names in search engine rankings and if Google keeps it that way, that is very bad news for generic domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DN Technologies</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty#comment-9295</link>
		<dc:creator>DN Technologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 12:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/index.php/in-web-development-there-is-one-certainty/#comment-9295</guid>
		<description>Very true. I think if you build a quality, visually appealing website with content that people are after you will do well. People will naturally want to view your site and recommend to others so backlinks will be naturally gained. Throw in some SEO and backlink building work yourself and you&#039;ll be bound for success. Just check the competition on the keywords you are targeting though to make sure you&#039;re not competiting against an already super premium established site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very true. I think if you build a quality, visually appealing website with content that people are after you will do well. People will naturally want to view your site and recommend to others so backlinks will be naturally gained. Throw in some SEO and backlink building work yourself and you&#8217;ll be bound for success. Just check the competition on the keywords you are targeting though to make sure you&#8217;re not competiting against an already super premium established site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/10 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.elliotsblog.com @ 2012-02-09 20:34:14 -->
