<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privacy After Domain Sales Isn&#8217;t a Given, Nor is it Free</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliotsblog.com/privacy-after-domain-sales-isnt-a-given-nor-is-it-free-3710/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/privacy-after-domain-sales-isnt-a-given-nor-is-it-free-3710</link>
	<description>Domain blog featuring domain investing strategy, domain valuation, and domain development commentary from Elliot Silver, founder of Top Notch Domains, LLC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Passing By</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/privacy-after-domain-sales-isnt-a-given-nor-is-it-free-3710#comment-27684</link>
		<dc:creator>Passing By</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 03:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=5134#comment-27684</guid>
		<description>Simple, don&#039;t use SEDO. I sold a name for mid 5-figures and used Escrow - com, the cost was less than $500. 

Sedo should NOT report sales without permission or ask for the 2.5% unless they sold it. 2.5% on top of everything else is insane just to do their job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple, don&#8217;t use SEDO. I sold a name for mid 5-figures and used Escrow &#8211; com, the cost was less than $500. </p>
<p>Sedo should NOT report sales without permission or ask for the 2.5% unless they sold it. 2.5% on top of everything else is insane just to do their job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/privacy-after-domain-sales-isnt-a-given-nor-is-it-free-3710#comment-22711</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=5134#comment-22711</guid>
		<description>I agree 100% with this comment:

&quot;Although I have not yet studied the specifics of Sedo’s recently imposed 2.5% transaction privacy option, at face value, this practice is improper, bordering on obscene, and wholly subverts the essential fiduciary responsibility of professional sales brokerage.&quot;

Recently Sedo did a great job of selling a domain for me. I almost fell off my chair when they told me they would charge me to keep the sale private. As a regular buyer/broker of high level names myself, I would never even *conceive* of breaching a client&#039;s privacy never mind charging for it. While I will use Tessa of Sedo again, and the policy is not her fault, I consider it one of the silliest and unprofessional fees/policies ever cooked up. It&#039;s not even worth arguing about it&#039;s so out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100% with this comment:</p>
<p>&#8220;Although I have not yet studied the specifics of Sedo’s recently imposed 2.5% transaction privacy option, at face value, this practice is improper, bordering on obscene, and wholly subverts the essential fiduciary responsibility of professional sales brokerage.&#8221;</p>
<p>Recently Sedo did a great job of selling a domain for me. I almost fell off my chair when they told me they would charge me to keep the sale private. As a regular buyer/broker of high level names myself, I would never even *conceive* of breaching a client&#8217;s privacy never mind charging for it. While I will use Tessa of Sedo again, and the policy is not her fault, I consider it one of the silliest and unprofessional fees/policies ever cooked up. It&#8217;s not even worth arguing about it&#8217;s so out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/privacy-after-domain-sales-isnt-a-given-nor-is-it-free-3710#comment-19352</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=5134#comment-19352</guid>
		<description>@ MJ

I wonder what some of my clients would say if I told them they needed to pay an extra 2.5% for me not to report their purchases to DNJournal. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ MJ</p>
<p>I wonder what some of my clients would say if I told them they needed to pay an extra 2.5% for me not to report their purchases to DNJournal. <img src='http://www.elliotsblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/privacy-after-domain-sales-isnt-a-given-nor-is-it-free-3710#comment-19351</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=5134#comment-19351</guid>
		<description>Ignoring the basic issue of privacy for the moment, the 2.5% &quot;fee&quot; strikes me as pretty darn usurious for simply keeping your mouth shut about something. At best it should be a flat fee in the $x to $xx range.

In fact, it just sounds a lot like what they used to call &quot;protection money&quot; -- though I guess some might consider it extortion or blackmail.

Thanks for the information, Elliot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignoring the basic issue of privacy for the moment, the 2.5% &#8220;fee&#8221; strikes me as pretty darn usurious for simply keeping your mouth shut about something. At best it should be a flat fee in the $x to $xx range.</p>
<p>In fact, it just sounds a lot like what they used to call &#8220;protection money&#8221; &#8212; though I guess some might consider it extortion or blackmail.</p>
<p>Thanks for the information, Elliot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Barclay</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/privacy-after-domain-sales-isnt-a-given-nor-is-it-free-3710#comment-19286</link>
		<dc:creator>James Barclay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=5134#comment-19286</guid>
		<description>I always use Escrow .Com - which ends any privacy discussion. I have never sold or bought names using Escrow and then finding that they went public. 

I am unclear why seasoned domainers dont just stick with Escrow.Com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always use Escrow .Com &#8211; which ends any privacy discussion. I have never sold or bought names using Escrow and then finding that they went public. </p>
<p>I am unclear why seasoned domainers dont just stick with Escrow.Com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/10 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.elliotsblog.com @ 2012-02-09 22:10:14 -->
