<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There Will be Less Domain Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliotsblog.com/there-will-be-lessdevelopment/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/there-will-be-lessdevelopment</link>
	<description>Domain blog featuring domain investing strategy, domain valuation, and domain development commentary from Elliot Silver, founder of Top Notch Domains, LLC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Orville J. Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/there-will-be-lessdevelopment#comment-8489</link>
		<dc:creator>Orville J. Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=1593#comment-8489</guid>
		<description>Hi Elliot,

Very insightful article.

I agree with you on your prediction for 2009, however, with that said, I still think a very important point is being over looked.

The key to domain development is go further than creating mini-sites or large content websites.

Instead, domain developers should be approaching domain development in the same manner regular business ideas are approached.

Think of real business concepts outside of ppc, affiliate marketing or any other type of similar monetization.

Build it like a real business and operate it like one.

This means that you might only be able to approach one or two good domain development projects per year.

That&#039;s ok

I truly believe the winners in the domain development game will be the ones that shift their perception of what has been described as domain development, to a view of creating real business concepts on top of their domains.

Keep the good content coming E!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Elliot,</p>
<p>Very insightful article.</p>
<p>I agree with you on your prediction for 2009, however, with that said, I still think a very important point is being over looked.</p>
<p>The key to domain development is go further than creating mini-sites or large content websites.</p>
<p>Instead, domain developers should be approaching domain development in the same manner regular business ideas are approached.</p>
<p>Think of real business concepts outside of ppc, affiliate marketing or any other type of similar monetization.</p>
<p>Build it like a real business and operate it like one.</p>
<p>This means that you might only be able to approach one or two good domain development projects per year.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s ok</p>
<p>I truly believe the winners in the domain development game will be the ones that shift their perception of what has been described as domain development, to a view of creating real business concepts on top of their domains.</p>
<p>Keep the good content coming E!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/there-will-be-lessdevelopment#comment-8314</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=1593#comment-8314</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s really important whether it&#039;s a five page site, a hundred page site, or what.  The important part that domainers in general are overlooking is that a website needs to be marketed.  I don&#039;t think it makes sense at all to build a nice website and not work to drive traffic to it.  Perhaps there are a few domains which get enough type in traffic that building a nice site to convert at a higher rate is a worthwhile investment, but for 99.9% of domains, that is not viable.  For most domainers, developing sites for all of the domains in your portfolio would be very unwise.

Having said that, I do highly recommend domainers to get their feet wet in developing websites.  I don&#039;t AT ALL recommend anyone get into the low quality type of website development.  Whether it&#039;s a poor quality design, or nearly unreadable content, I see time and again domainers throwing away money with these sub-par development companies.  Just don&#039;t do it.  Take the time, or make the investment, in developing a high quality site.  One that you&#039;d be proud to own.  Then, invest in promoting the site so actual people come to visit it.  If you&#039;re budget is so low you can only afford crap, take the time to do it yourself.  If you don&#039;t have either time or money, just keep the domains parked, or sell them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s really important whether it&#8217;s a five page site, a hundred page site, or what.  The important part that domainers in general are overlooking is that a website needs to be marketed.  I don&#8217;t think it makes sense at all to build a nice website and not work to drive traffic to it.  Perhaps there are a few domains which get enough type in traffic that building a nice site to convert at a higher rate is a worthwhile investment, but for 99.9% of domains, that is not viable.  For most domainers, developing sites for all of the domains in your portfolio would be very unwise.</p>
<p>Having said that, I do highly recommend domainers to get their feet wet in developing websites.  I don&#8217;t AT ALL recommend anyone get into the low quality type of website development.  Whether it&#8217;s a poor quality design, or nearly unreadable content, I see time and again domainers throwing away money with these sub-par development companies.  Just don&#8217;t do it.  Take the time, or make the investment, in developing a high quality site.  One that you&#8217;d be proud to own.  Then, invest in promoting the site so actual people come to visit it.  If you&#8217;re budget is so low you can only afford crap, take the time to do it yourself.  If you don&#8217;t have either time or money, just keep the domains parked, or sell them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/there-will-be-lessdevelopment#comment-8308</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=1593#comment-8308</guid>
		<description>As a mini-site and parking developer you forgot to mention VentureNames.com, who are VERY up and coming in this game. I have many domains with them for sale using their AdSense parked templates which IMO are excellent!

It&#039;s been fairly obvious that development is the way forward since PPC rev started dropping a few years ago, I think Google is probably one of the highest paying anyway at the moment and probably still will be in years to come..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a mini-site and parking developer you forgot to mention VentureNames.com, who are VERY up and coming in this game. I have many domains with them for sale using their AdSense parked templates which IMO are excellent!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been fairly obvious that development is the way forward since PPC rev started dropping a few years ago, I think Google is probably one of the highest paying anyway at the moment and probably still will be in years to come..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/there-will-be-lessdevelopment#comment-8307</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=1593#comment-8307</guid>
		<description>Nice devil&#039;s advocate article, E!

What you didn&#039;t cover was the fact that if you aren&#039;t putting at least SOME relevant content on your domains, and you&#039;re leaving them to rot on some parking service with landing pages of adlinks, your domains won&#039;t build ANY value at all. SE&#039;s do NOT index landing pages. Period. 

If you don&#039;t have a typein domain, longtailed or not, but it&#039;s a generic brand niche domain you believe in, then you ABSOLUTELY NEED to have relevant content on the domain to get a chance for SE indexing. Once your domain is indexed on a search engine, the domain value doubles, at the minimum.

So, most domainers in 2009 will make the decision: &quot;Do I try to sell my domains I can&#039;t afford to hire web design teams to develop, or do I just let them expire, or do I spend a one-time fee of $.99 per domain at Whypark.com to at least get RSS and other content feeds on them to establish their existence and indexing by search engines, thereby increasing their resale value?

If a domainer has a list of domains they believe in, but they can&#039;t monetize them through parking services (which are based on typein and backlinks), then the domainer needs to make the decision to keep, sell or release those domains. If you have 1000 domains that aren&#039;t making money at a parking service, then sign up for a discounted bulk account at Whypark, where you can get all your domains parked with relevant current content for less than a dollar per domain.

After you do that, you can follow your domains&#039; performance, and decide to invest a few dollars more into the domains you see showing promise. I think your readers would be amazed at how little it costs to build out nice-looking, content-rich websites if they knew where to go.

Cheers!

Stephen Douglas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice devil&#8217;s advocate article, E!</p>
<p>What you didn&#8217;t cover was the fact that if you aren&#8217;t putting at least SOME relevant content on your domains, and you&#8217;re leaving them to rot on some parking service with landing pages of adlinks, your domains won&#8217;t build ANY value at all. SE&#8217;s do NOT index landing pages. Period. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have a typein domain, longtailed or not, but it&#8217;s a generic brand niche domain you believe in, then you ABSOLUTELY NEED to have relevant content on the domain to get a chance for SE indexing. Once your domain is indexed on a search engine, the domain value doubles, at the minimum.</p>
<p>So, most domainers in 2009 will make the decision: &#8220;Do I try to sell my domains I can&#8217;t afford to hire web design teams to develop, or do I just let them expire, or do I spend a one-time fee of $.99 per domain at Whypark.com to at least get RSS and other content feeds on them to establish their existence and indexing by search engines, thereby increasing their resale value?</p>
<p>If a domainer has a list of domains they believe in, but they can&#8217;t monetize them through parking services (which are based on typein and backlinks), then the domainer needs to make the decision to keep, sell or release those domains. If you have 1000 domains that aren&#8217;t making money at a parking service, then sign up for a discounted bulk account at Whypark, where you can get all your domains parked with relevant current content for less than a dollar per domain.</p>
<p>After you do that, you can follow your domains&#8217; performance, and decide to invest a few dollars more into the domains you see showing promise. I think your readers would be amazed at how little it costs to build out nice-looking, content-rich websites if they knew where to go.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
<p>Stephen Douglas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Colascione</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/there-will-be-lessdevelopment#comment-8306</link>
		<dc:creator>John Colascione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=1593#comment-8306</guid>
		<description>Many will realize that development may not work unless some good &#039;ole hard work is mixed in there.... Now with the search engines, particularly Google, are being pickier than ever, development could be less effective than most are expecting. I predict, many will spend countless hours, days, and maybe months developing mini-sites that wind up making less than expected. It&#039;s a good time to build a few of your best names into businesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many will realize that development may not work unless some good &#8216;ole hard work is mixed in there&#8230;. Now with the search engines, particularly Google, are being pickier than ever, development could be less effective than most are expecting. I predict, many will spend countless hours, days, and maybe months developing mini-sites that wind up making less than expected. It&#8217;s a good time to build a few of your best names into businesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.elliotsblog.com @ 2012-02-09 15:12:04 -->
