
What’s the Least Valuable Domain Extension?
Aside from some small speculation in new TLDs, I don’t really buy anything other than .COM domain names. In fact, I looked through my Moniker account where the bulk of my domain names are registered, and around 2% are not .COM names. 2% may even seem him to some people, but keep in mind that this includes personal names like ElliotSilver.net/.info and other protective registrations rather than investments.
I recently saw a couple of decent keyword domain names for sale in a domain forum, but because they were in an “alternate” (not ccTLD) extension, the price was pretty low and there were still no bids. One name would be a high 6 or low 7 figure city.com domain name, but the owner was asking for under $2,000 without any interest or public offers. I also think this domain name in its country code ccTLD would be worth several thousand dollars.
It got me thinking about the value of non-.com domain names (I was not considering ccTLD domain names). In your opinion, what is the least valuable domain extension? Feel free to post the reason you think the extension doesn’t have much value. This is more out of morbid curiosity than anything else.
Other articles of interest:
- Foreign Companies Using .US Extension I noticed something interesting during my travels and don’t know...
- Tip for Buying Valuable Domain Drops I usually spend a couple hours a morning using Freshdrop...
- How .nyc Can Become the Extension for New York City I am not a native New Yorker. I have only...










Comments (64)
mrx
September 10th, 2010 at 2:05 pm
.mobi
John Daly
September 10th, 2010 at 2:07 pm
It depends on your strategy – are you looking to develop or flip? I would have to say the keywords itself must fit the bill, if you have to veer away from .com than keep in mind what industry it is. I’ve flipped a .net domain for 35k in under a week and a .org for 100k which would be usenet.org. This fit their strategy and the keyword as an organization based around the usenet directory system. I find when developing with .org it can walk me into doors I wouldn’t have with .net or .com because it insinuates a non for profit and people have a higher regard for it (again depending on industry). I’ve gotten links on pr 7 – 8 pages because of it where with .com and .net they would have told me to beat it.
I have an SEO client on the other hand that runs his company with a – and a .net yet it gets about 40,000 uniques a month in the shoe industry. If I touch that site with a good link it jumps so it seems to me SEO wise .net can react the same way as a .com where I find a .org might take a little longer to rank from experience.
One other example for .info though I have seen these rank, type “black friday” into Google and what comes up? All the other extensions are on lock down as underdeveloped or parked and this guy makes a boatload once a year.
Overall I would have to say “What’s the keyword and what are your goals?” in terms of value.
Anthony
September 10th, 2010 at 2:14 pm
Elliot … technology has made .mobi completely unnecessary.
William
September 10th, 2010 at 2:31 pm
.pro – total garbage
mark
September 10th, 2010 at 2:39 pm
.cc
Leonard Britt
September 10th, 2010 at 3:21 pm
IMO .mobi & .ws are way down there in end user appeal with .biz still not attracting many aftermarket buyers. If you are going to register a .US or .Info they need to be top-notch keywords. I hold probably about five legacy .biz domains, one .WS domain, zero .US domains and by year-end probably around 30 .info domains. I realize you are a .COM only investor but I have sold quite a few .Net domains & just received an end user inquiry today on a .TV. We’ll see how it goes.
Mark Jeftovic
September 10th, 2010 at 3:34 pm
.TEL wins hands down, the TLD is fundamentally crippled because you can’t set your own nameservers.
Mind bogglingly stupid. In fact we (easyDNS) just DROPPED support for new .TEL registrations because they’re so useless.
Daniel Dryzek
September 10th, 2010 at 3:44 pm
.aero (least valuable)
.jobs
.pro
.mobi
.tel
.asia (most valuable out of least valuable extensions)
George Pickering
September 10th, 2010 at 3:49 pm
I’ve gotten more inquires about .pro than my .net and .org investments. Don’t sleep on .pro – especially with local professionals.
George Pickering
September 10th, 2010 at 3:50 pm
And least valuable
1) .ws
2) .cc
3) .mobi
4) .tel
5) .biz
Peter Davis
September 10th, 2010 at 3:56 pm
I have to mention .info as being one of, if not the, least valuable. In fact, I like how .info looks and reads, the problem with it is that by deep discounting the .info domains have become associated with spammers and if you try to build a website on a .info domain you’d be the equivalent of a contagious leper at an open lunch buffet at a popular restaurant.
AB
September 10th, 2010 at 4:10 pm
.name
Anthony
September 10th, 2010 at 4:22 pm
.name … lol useless we forgot about it
Anthony
September 10th, 2010 at 4:23 pm
.name … lol so useless we forgot about it
jason
September 10th, 2010 at 4:25 pm
I disagree with .info as being worthless. I once purchased a .info and flipped it in 10 days. It was a very good name, and the .com purchased it in an ad I put up.
I own more than 100 .info that are all great names. I seem to struggle with selling the .net and the .mobi. I received an offer on a .mobi, but when I responded with accepting the offer, the .com name owner never replied back.
Maybe the webmaster thought about the .mobi. The same domain was accepted, and then rejected when I put it in a package deal.
I own 7 .mobi names that would all be worth a fortune if they were .com. The least valuable extension is probably the .ws, and .me. There are times when the .com is the only worthy extension for specific services.
The .net is a great choice if the .com is taken, and used for something unrelated to the specific market. The .ws and the .me have little value. I’m find the .mobi is a tough sale, even if you have the best keywords.
Jason
September 10th, 2010 at 4:41 pm
@John,
Awesome .org sale. That’s a blockbuster sale to be pushed at RickLatona.com. What was your initial cost for the domain?
I plan on having another develop GoGPS.net for me. In past few months, there have many searches for the keywords. It’s only a mere 1.5% of your domain.
Jason
September 10th, 2010 at 4:47 pm
The .us has been a awesome extension for me. I sold two this past month. I have many in various fields. I plan to upgrade my Bargain Domains account to push more .us.
I received an offer at Sedo for a .us. I closed the deal two weeks ago. The company developed the domain 4 days after purchasing the domain. Don’t disregard the value of the .us.
Riq
September 10th, 2010 at 5:09 pm
Least valuable:
.Aero
.Name
.Ws
.CC
.Tel
.Pro
I bought about 100 .Mobis and by seling just 4 of them I recouped all my costs plus few years of renewals for the rest.
.Info has been the most valuable for me among newer extensions; have had over $200K sales in them since acquiring them in 2001/02 landrush.
Timmy
September 10th, 2010 at 5:30 pm
.co is definitely the least valuable! Just sends traffic to the .com
Timmy
September 10th, 2010 at 5:31 pm
ElliotSilver.co is available
Jim
September 10th, 2010 at 5:48 pm
“.co is definitely the least valuable! Just sends traffic to the .com”
Lol, a CO hater who is angry because he missed out the landrush.
You have to be horribly biased to say that CO is the least valuable.
TD
September 10th, 2010 at 6:05 pm
“.co is definitely the least valuable! Just sends traffic to the .com”
wouldn’t that make .co the second most valuable extension?
I vote .name and .aero. even the top 5 left of the dot keywords prolly wouldn’t sell.
Fun question
Jason
September 10th, 2010 at 6:10 pm
@Riq,
What’s your number #1 .info sale?
Elliot
September 10th, 2010 at 6:13 pm
It would be interesting to see how much traffic Name.com gets as a result of .name error typos… probably not much, but would be interesting to know.
Louise
September 10th, 2010 at 8:10 pm
@ John, great sale! Are you the John Daly of golf fame?
.ki, because it’s so expensive: $2500.00. Then again, maybe that would guarantee only developers register .ki, and create great websites. Golf.ki is still available, last time I checked.
The ones mentioned above seem the higher value ones, except .mobi. Latonas is auctioning flowers.mobi, and Rob Monster is auctioning SEO.mobi. We can gage its worth depending how those do.
.info is increasing more and more. It’s a more popular registration than .org or .net in some cases, I’ve noticed!
Hey, I flipped my one-and-only .cm for registration fee!
Timmy
September 10th, 2010 at 9:49 pm
Jim,
. Some sucker will regret that purchase! Obviously, with some of the crazy high bids and the registration numbers .co is not the least valuable. Again Jim, sarcasm.co is the name for you!
Sarcasm.co, you should look it up, learn it, and possible buy it from the current owner. I got the only name I wanted in the .co land rush. I got out of the slots.co bidding after it went past $200
Kevin
September 11th, 2010 at 4:45 am
I think some gambling/adult domains are of some worth in a different extension. Let’s compare Poker examples:
OnlinePoker.com vs OnlinePoker.cc
Poker.cc sold for $6,802..hence making domains like OnlinePoker.cc more valuable than a random .cc which has no value.
Just my $0.02
Kevin
September 11th, 2010 at 4:48 am
Adult and gambling domains are always very valuable in ay extension. Take:
OnlinePoker.com vs OnlinePoker.cc
So if someone owns OnlinePoker.cc, he could ask for a higher asking price. Poker.cc sold for $6,802 so definitely OnlinePoker.cc has a solid monetary value.
Just my $0.02
Jeroen
September 11th, 2010 at 6:54 am
I would ask myself which domain extension has the most amount of ‘least valuable’ domains relatively speaking. I don’t know the answer.
There are some valuable .aero’s and info’s used by businesses that couldn’t get the .com. An anecdote about .info: Couple of years ago, I registered a [professionname].info for a friend., other extensions like .com were taken. Then I build a barely seo’d site on it that generated more customers for my friend. So this .info proved to be very valuable.
Kate
September 11th, 2010 at 7:31 am
.tk is a good candidate
Chadi Ghaith
September 11th, 2010 at 8:56 am
.co because its the only domains which has a dependent identity and feeds on the .com success.
.co is like a semi sneeze that never make it to become a heard one.
And no, trust me; I’m not one of those who are angry for missing the landrush.
However, the .co success has truly cheapened this whole industry in a way.
What’s next? .ho, I guess this would be more meaningful than .co.
chris
September 11th, 2010 at 10:30 am
i think i will stand up for the poor .cc LOL’s
when you want a favicon to be generated, you normally end up at favicon.cc and there’s a few other dark horses out around.
.name is an epic fail +10
.mobi kinda got lame real quick
i think its what you do with it, good marketing can help any extension.
Nadia
September 11th, 2010 at 10:53 am
I’d say .mobi, & .biz are by far the worst. I don’t have any .ws, .cc, .tv, or .tel. I don’t agree with the statement that .info is worthless, because Germans seem to love it. After .de and .com, it’s the extension they buy the most. Considering all of the offers I’ve received this year have been from German buyers, I pay quite a bit of attention to .info.
GodOfDomains.com
September 11th, 2010 at 11:13 am
Worthless is .tk
I sold Mortgage.tk in bido auction for just $28 !!
Jason
September 11th, 2010 at 11:31 am
@Nadia,
Which .info keywords do the Germans seem to like most? German words or some American good and services?Thanks.
Eric
September 11th, 2010 at 11:46 am
I have to agree .mobi domains are worthless. .cc domains are worthless also but personally I have had good experiences with the extension. I sold OnlineCasinos.cc and Online-Casino.cc for $2,500 and $1,000 respectfully. Now, I hand reg’d both of these names and sold them in less than 30 days via SEDO but I’ve had Easter.cc for a year now and I can’t even get a bite…..therefore .cc is bad but a good casino name in any extension is probably going to make a good profit.
Chris Nielsen
September 11th, 2010 at 12:50 pm
I wonder how much the content of these comments would change if all the emotion was removed…?
It’s interesting to me that some tlds that are mentioned are ones with many registrations and some fairly high-priced sales. I don’t like .info anymore, but I know they are popular in Europe for example.
I would say the least valuable in general are those tlds with very low reg numbers and very high renewal costs. And I think that excludes all of the tlds I heard mentioned here.
Oh, I heard about a private auction sale last week of a .co domain that sold for $76,000! I dislike .co, but that is an emotional response because I am too stupid to get in on the domain “musical chairs” action there.
Rob
September 11th, 2010 at 2:41 pm
As non .com search engine traffic generators it seems that .net and .org are the best (excluding ccTLDs). With the right SEO though the rest of the extensions might be up to par. We have some nice generic .co and .me domains including CowboyHats.co, WorkShoes.co, LaptopComputers.me and Surfboards.me that with some SEO elbow grease might be as good as their .net, .org counterparts.
Chris Nielsen
September 11th, 2010 at 3:31 pm
A very good point that all SEO consultants know, but not so many domainers. With SEO and other marketing and promotion techniques, just about any domain can have a site that performs well. The first expired domain we ever bought was BizProLink-Internet.com and that site has been one of our top 3 money makers for years.
I guess you can’t really judge a domain by it’s TLD.
Domain Promo Codes
September 11th, 2010 at 4:04 pm
For me , Develope or sell ? if you will develope go with any extension , if you will sell try to get .com
John daly , your comment is perfect ,
Here is , “Overall I would have to say “What’s the keyword and what are your goals?” in terms of value.”
Joe Plummer
September 11th, 2010 at 4:22 pm
.CM
I spent about $3,500 on them, no offers (good terms too: OnlineCasinos.cm, HomeMortgage.cm, alcoholism.cm, etc.)
Next up: .us.com (had some good terms, including “silver” and never an offer.)
Mobis, nothing.
.com, .net and .org…seems to be the only good market for me. (With the vast majority of sales being .com)
John Marks
September 11th, 2010 at 7:10 pm
“TEL wins hands down, the TLD is fundamentally crippled because you can’t set your own nameservers.”
If you understand how .tel works and what you can use it for you will change your mind very quickly.
Most useless:
.ws
.name
.jobs
.mobi
.cc
Commerce Mobile
September 11th, 2010 at 7:36 pm
If we consider only the international extensions, I would say that the .biz is the least valuable. The reason is that there was no need to create a second commercial extension.
Jerry
September 11th, 2010 at 7:39 pm
I’ve had more success in the last 6 mos. with non.com domains on the reseller front than with .com in the last 2-3 years combined. Mostly .nets & .infos… I have had some exceptional sales with .coms, but that extension has long since been mined for its valuables. As Elliot mentioned above in regards to protective registrations, I believe non .com equivalents have grown in value with .com owners, even if they themselves are resellers.
IMO, value lies in the eye of the end-user
onedot
September 11th, 2010 at 8:12 pm
I own http://www.vouchers.to. I always thought it was a terrific domain name.
But the ‘industry’ doesn’t like it. I can’t sell it.
How come blog.us is better?
Jason
September 11th, 2010 at 8:20 pm
.Us has been an excellent extension for me. Of course, .com is my number #1 extension. .info is in a close third. .net has been a disaster, though I do have some good names. No action with .biz and .mobi are virtually impossible to sell.
Jason
September 11th, 2010 at 8:33 pm
There’s constant demand for the .us. Owning the keyword “blog” in any extension will generate interest. Blog is a popular keyword type-in.
Blog has average keyword results of 100 million. Blog.us will definitely generate interest. I’m sure Sedo would approve the domain for the great domain auction.
Louise
September 12th, 2010 at 1:08 am
Just read Neustar’s news release that DNSSEC are fully deployed in .biz/.us, with .biz having an extra security feature of Registry Lock. Those security features elevate .biz/.us extension in a huge way to me! There’s no denying Neustar is cutting edge as far as security. Developers might find it a great selling point for properties they actually invest $$/time into. It speaks well for .co Neustar is handling that as well, plus there are no private registrations with .co!
DNSSEC also recently enabled for .eu.
DNSSEC gives authority to those extensions; maybe it will make them more appealing!
Nadia
September 12th, 2010 at 1:22 am
@Jason: Sorry this is so late. I didn’t see your comment at first. In terms of Germans & .info – I meant German terms. These types of domains (depending on keywords, of course) are in high demand on Sedo. An example is Baukredit.info (not mine), which translates to “construction loan.” If you search in Google.de you also see .info being used for company websites.
John | PrintableGroceryCoupons.net
September 12th, 2010 at 10:53 am
I would rather have a keyword domain that is not .com than a random .com. I have no problem with .info and I think they will gain appeal.
Mitch
September 12th, 2010 at 12:40 pm
I’ve bookmarked some dotCC & dotName active sites I found over the years that I visit on occassion.
I wouldn’t register them as a domainer, but as a person seeking information they do the job for me.
http://www.restaurantrow.name (found on 1st page of google for “restaurant row” It forwards to a dotCom)
http://www.nips.cc ( #1 at google for nips with 37,900,000 results)
http://www.grassroots.cc Nice site.
Louise
September 12th, 2010 at 4:06 pm
If you type, “website hosting” into Google in quotes,
WebsiteHosting.cc is page 1; #7.
If you type in just: Justin, Justin.tv comes up #1!
The other day I saw a .biz on page one of a generic search – wish I could remember! It was a big term.
It takes effort to build a site, then patience to watch it rank!
Elliot is going to do well with Bahamas.co!!!
Lance
September 13th, 2010 at 1:28 am
I think
.ws
.mobi
.name
.Jobs
.cc
.aero
are most least valuable extensions.
However if you develop a website with lot effort on any extension it worth more than popular extension name.
my $0.02
Mark
September 13th, 2010 at 12:17 pm
.info can definitely do very well when developed properly – there appears to be no penalty for the .info extension with search engines, even for very competitive keywords.
In my (limited) experience google analytics data confirms that plenty of people seem to remember how to type in a .info site once they become aware of it.
And people don’t look at you like you’ve landed from Mars when you tell them your site is xxxxxxxxxx.info
Don
September 22nd, 2010 at 1:23 pm
I would say .tel .ws .aero
Some say .mobi is in this crowd. Maybe for now.
Well with a few tweeks with the technology then they could still be worth a fortune later on.
Dont count that extension out, esp since everyone has a mobile phone… MMM I wonder why they where bought out
Artur
September 22nd, 2010 at 5:39 pm
Don, dream on.
You must have loads of .mobi domains
Elliot
September 22nd, 2010 at 5:45 pm
@ Don
LOL… thanks for the laugh. As I’ve said before, I wouldn’t take a mobi if it was free.
Al | Printable Coupons Guy
November 20th, 2010 at 11:14 am
I think exact match domains are best if you are willing to pay the price up front for them.
Google gives them a bonus it seems. However, there are lots of sites ranking really well without and exact match. I guess it comes down to how much time are you willing to invest to get the site to rank. It you have the time then you don’t necessarily need the exact match, but if you are in a hurry and have the money go for the exact match.
Carl
March 10th, 2011 at 1:42 am
Just sold a.mobi xxxxx sounds like there’s still a pulse.
Boluji
March 22nd, 2011 at 1:53 pm
Comparf with everybody ‘s views I have not red any one to talk about the sales of .in and that shows the least worthy ccTLDs suffix.
Jxff
April 11th, 2011 at 4:25 pm
I was wondering if anyone thought socialseo.info would work nice for an authority site for social SEO? I am developing a hosting company that will be offering an SEO package and I thought I could use socialseo.info for traffic.
Elliot Silver
April 11th, 2011 at 4:26 pm
@ Jeff
I can’t imagine a circumstance in which I would develop a .info domain name.
Jxff
April 14th, 2011 at 4:34 pm
@ Elliot
I appreciate the straightforward reply. I just did a Google using “seo info” without quotes or operators and the third organic link was an .info site. The results for “social seo info” returned an .info site for the fourth organic link.
Gaines Milligan
February 22nd, 2012 at 4:47 pm
I registered buyco.ws and sellco.ws
hoping to find a buyer in the cow business.
Anyone tell me what’s so bad about that?
I am really a newbie domainer and have ireckon about 150 domains registered so far.
Looking for a 12-step program so I can quit.
Leave a reply