Comments on: Why It’s Bad Not to Respond to UDRP

By: iBusiness

iBusiness — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 19:10:13 +0000

Do you really, really think the bad guys would use their correct name or a legitimate company name?

I doubt many of them still operate out of the U.S., Canada and some european countries.

It is easy enough to set up a gmail email acct to use for the authorized email address.

What difference does it make regarding the personal or company name and address?

The most important thing for the cybersquatters are –
1. the admin. email address
2. access to change dns
3. multiple ppc accts or a hosting acct.

Cybersquatters are like weeds. You can temporarily kill or injure them but they will keep coming back somewhere near by.

By: Josh

Josh — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:01:42 +0000

Elliot did you look at the owner of the name, it isnt his first..second…third errr get my drift, rodeo with a udrp or wipo. This is your mother who owns a generic who didnt respond.

By: Josh

Josh — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:00:09 +0000

7days.com, I agree, generic, valuable? Well it does show ovt/w and gets some XX traffic a day, maybe a $XXXX+ name. So I looked, the owner was no stranger to udrp/wipo, likely wasnt worth the fight for him, jmo.

By: mrx

mrx — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:08:27 +0000

@ How many 100% legit investors deal with multiple udrps in a year?

That may change soon if ICANN allows a Uniform Rapid Suspension (URS)

By: Elliot

Elliot — Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:31:59 +0000

@ Josh

I think 7Days.com is pretty generic