<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo and Intel to Bring Widgets to Television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliotsblog.com/yahoo-and-intel-to-bring-widgets-to-television/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/yahoo-and-intel-to-bring-widgets-to-television</link>
	<description>Domain blog featuring domain investing strategy, domain valuation, and domain development commentary from Elliot Silver, founder of Top Notch Domains, LLC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/yahoo-and-intel-to-bring-widgets-to-television#comment-5611</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=945#comment-5611</guid>
		<description>Jason,

Your comment about Rick&#039;s widgets.com &quot;but when you’ve got the traffic, YOU make the rules&quot; is true in theory but its not helping the industry and those rules affect everyone.

It would be nice to see Rick develop anything that doesn&#039;t look spammy.  Don&#039;t get me wrong - I&#039;m not cutting down Rick&#039;s ability to sell names and promote the industry - but the credibility factor is always lost when traditional institutions look up sites like this.  And we need these people to understand, support and join in much bugger numbers than today - (such as banks and venture capitalist)

You can sell an industry all you want but when designs look like spam - guess what, they are spam - to outsiders.

Widgets.com is just a horrible website. For $100 anybody could design a better landing page and that $100 would pay off in spades down the road.

Alan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>Your comment about Rick&#8217;s widgets.com &#8220;but when you’ve got the traffic, YOU make the rules&#8221; is true in theory but its not helping the industry and those rules affect everyone.</p>
<p>It would be nice to see Rick develop anything that doesn&#8217;t look spammy.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong &#8211; I&#8217;m not cutting down Rick&#8217;s ability to sell names and promote the industry &#8211; but the credibility factor is always lost when traditional institutions look up sites like this.  And we need these people to understand, support and join in much bugger numbers than today &#8211; (such as banks and venture capitalist)</p>
<p>You can sell an industry all you want but when designs look like spam &#8211; guess what, they are spam &#8211; to outsiders.</p>
<p>Widgets.com is just a horrible website. For $100 anybody could design a better landing page and that $100 would pay off in spades down the road.</p>
<p>Alan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Davids</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/yahoo-and-intel-to-bring-widgets-to-television#comment-5585</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Davids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 12:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=945#comment-5585</guid>
		<description>T V isn&#039;t dead yet. As more homes become smart homes and the &quot;60 inch super high def LCD&quot;  hooked to your computer IS your tv, things like widgets could be a smart move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T V isn&#8217;t dead yet. As more homes become smart homes and the &#8220;60 inch super high def LCD&#8221;  hooked to your computer IS your tv, things like widgets could be a smart move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari Shohat</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/yahoo-and-intel-to-bring-widgets-to-television#comment-5583</link>
		<dc:creator>Ari Shohat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=945#comment-5583</guid>
		<description>I understand wanting to get into the widget space, but for &quot;television&quot;? Talk about backward thinking, something is very wrong here. 

While everyone is being busy killing off TV and bringing it online, these two are working to bring the net to the dying platform. Brilliant. No wonder YHOO and INTL are where they are lately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand wanting to get into the widget space, but for &#8220;television&#8221;? Talk about backward thinking, something is very wrong here. </p>
<p>While everyone is being busy killing off TV and bringing it online, these two are working to bring the net to the dying platform. Brilliant. No wonder YHOO and INTL are where they are lately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.elliotsblog.com/yahoo-and-intel-to-bring-widgets-to-television#comment-5582</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliotsblog.com/?p=945#comment-5582</guid>
		<description>I wish Rick S. would let Rick L. make a website for him. One of the most spammy looking pages I&#039;ve ever run into -- I almost miss the pop-unders... but when you&#039;ve got the traffic, YOU make the rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish Rick S. would let Rick L. make a website for him. One of the most spammy looking pages I&#8217;ve ever run into &#8212; I almost miss the pop-unders&#8230; but when you&#8217;ve got the traffic, YOU make the rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.005 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.elliotsblog.com @ 2012-02-09 21:27:30 -->
